We build revenue systems that produce pipeline you can count on.
Most teams have the tools. We build the GTM system that connects them node by node, so leads show up clean, move on their own, and turn into revenue.
Built in 4 to 12 weeks. Documented. 100% yours when we're done.
The tools aren't the problem. The system nobody built is.
A new revenue leader inherited a CRM they didn't build. They can't trust what's in it. There is a pipeline number, but nobody can show what's behind it. Every forecast conversation starts with "well, it depends on how you count it."
Multiple motions, no unified system. PLG, inbound, and outbound are all running but they're not talking to each other. Data lives in three places. Handoff from marketing to sales is a Slack message and a prayer.
The platform migration exposed the real problem. Switching to HubSpot revealed how much was held together by one person's memory and a dozen overlapping Zaps nobody fully understands.
Reps are doing research that should be automated. Two hours before a call, they're looking up the prospect on LinkedIn, checking the company news, and writing a first line that should've been waiting for them already.
5 layers, one engineered system.
Most companies need 3 or 4 of these, not all 5. If you don't already know which, you will after the first call.
Data Orchestration and Enrichment
Enrichment pipelines that keep your CRM current without reps touching them. Company size, tech stack, intent signals. All updated automatically as accounts move through your funnel. Clean data first, or everything else fails.
CRM Architecture and System of Record
A CRM rebuilt around how the business actually sells now, not how it sold two years ago. Pipeline stages, object relationships, ownership rules: all of it designed intentionally and documented so the next person can understand it without asking anyone.
If your CRM can't answer "what's in pipeline and why," this is the starting point.
Intelligent Inbound Automation
A form fill shouldn't take hours to reach a rep. Routing logic, lead scoring, and follow-up sequences built around how your ICP actually buys. Speed-to-lead is still one of the highest-leverage variables in B2B, and most companies leave it entirely to chance.
Context-Driven Outbound
Outbound that arrives with context instead of sounding like everyone else's template. Sequencing infrastructure built around real signals: job changes, funding rounds, tech stack shifts, hiring patterns. Reply rates under 3% are usually a relevance problem, not a product problem.
Agentic AI and Cognitive Automation
Not copilots for writing subject lines. Agents that do research, draft call prep briefs, surface expansion signals, and trigger next actions without someone asking them to. Work that happens in the background while the team is on calls.
Only works if the data is clean. That's why this layer is last.
Diagnose. Build. Document.
Every engagement runs through the same 3 phases, 4 to 12 weeks in total. The scope of each phase depends on which layers we are building.
Diagnose
We embed in your data, CRM, reporting, and team's workflows. By the end you get a written document: what is working, what is broken, what is costing you revenue, and the order to fix it in.
Engagement fees are sized to the scope of the build, not to the size of the company. We discuss specifics on the first call.
Built by an operator, not a consultant who became one.
Alex Artemenko
Founder, Clevnode
Connect with me on Linkedin↗Clevnode is built on a specific bet: that the people best placed to fix revenue systems are the ones who carried a quota on top of broken ones.
Eight years in enterprise SaaS sales: Medidata, working with global pharma on clinical trial technology. Clarivate, selling research and IP intelligence into the same life sciences buyers. BlockFills, selling digital asset infrastructure to hedge funds, market makers, and prop trading desks.
What that taught me is that almost every revenue problem at a B2B company has the same shape: the original setup was right for the first stage of growth, and nobody had the time to rework it before it broke. Clevnode is the firm I wish existed when I was on the other side of the table.
"Most RevOps work ends with a Notion doc and a deck. The point here is to build something real and then make sure your team can run it without us."
Clevnode is intentionally small. No subcontractors. No delivery team. I run every engagement personally, and the work comes with documentation thorough enough that the next person, internal or external, can pick it up without a transition call.
Companies named are former employers, listed to describe the work, not to imply endorsement.
The questions people actually ask on the first call.
If something isn't covered here, the 30-minute working session is the right place to ask it.
How is this different from hiring a RevOps consultant?
Most consultants diagnose and advise. Clevnode diagnoses and builds. There's a working deliverable at the end that lives in your stack, not a recommendations doc that sits in someone's email until it gets stale. The distinction matters because advice without implementation rarely changes anything.
What CRM or tools do we need to already have?
None in particular. The work adapts to your stack: HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Clay, Apollo, Outreach, Salesloft, n8n, Zapier, or combinations of them. If you're mid-migration, that's actually a good time to start. Fewer entrenched bad habits to work around.
What does a typical engagement cost?
Engagement fees are sized to the scope of the build, not the size of your company. The number depends on which of the 5 GTM layers you need built, how much of your current setup is salvageable, and how much your team can carry alongside us. The build is typically a fixed-scope project spanning 4 to 12 weeks. If you want us to stay on afterward, that moves to an Operating Partner arrangement. We discuss specifics on the first call. If you are too early to get real value from this, we will tell you, rather than sell you a build you are not ready for.
What does fixed-scope actually mean for us?
It means you know what you're getting and what it costs before we start. No hourly billing, no change-order surprises. If something genuinely changes mid-build, we have a conversation before it affects cost, not an invoice afterward.
How do you work with our existing team?
We work with them, not around them. Your revenue leaders are in every working session. Your operations people own the system the day we leave. If your team is not in the room, the documentation phase is wasted.
What does "you own everything" mean in practice?
Every workflow, automation, data model, and configuration lives in your accounts and is documented. No proprietary tools, no platforms that require an ongoing license from Clevnode, no black boxes. You can hand it to an internal person or a different agency and they can work with it.
Is Clevnode right for us if we're still early stage?
Probably not yet, and I'd rather tell you that than take the engagement. Early on, the constraint is usually product-market fit or sales volume, not the sophistication of your GTM infrastructure. These builds pay off most when you're scaling a motion that's already working.
You have no public case studies. How do I get comfortable?
Honestly, by talking to me for 30 minutes. Clevnode is new. The operator behind it is not. The first conversation is a working session, not a pitch.
What if we decide to stop after the diagnostic?
Then we stop. You keep the diagnostic document, you keep the recommendations, and there is no pressure to continue into the build. About one in five conversations should end there. That is the system working as intended.
Show up with nothing.
We'll find what's broken.
30 minutes. No deck, no pitch. You bring the current state, we bring the questions. By the end of the call you will know whether Clevnode is the right next move. If it is not, you will leave with something useful anyway.
No prep required. No sales sequence after. No follow-up unless you ask for it.